Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Secrecy in choosing vacant School Board replacement is bad. Hypocrisy is worse.

I surprised myself last month. Upon hearing the news that former Tooele District Superintendent Michael Johnsen was chosen as outgoing State School Board member Richard Moss' replacement, I was thrilled that the Governor actually made a good decision. Not just a good decision, a great decision! However, my elation blinded me to the fact that there was not a shred of transparency in the process. Had the person been someone that I felt was not good for public education you would have been reading this post a month ago when the selection was made! Shame on me for being a hypocrite. Unfortunately, I'm not the only hypocrite.

There is already a problem with how the State School Board is elected in Utah. I've written at length about the process, but to quickly summarize, a committee is appointed from within the Governor's office. They interview candidates and narrow them down to three from within each district. They recommend three candidates to the Governor who likewise narrows the field down to two whose names are then placed on the ballot where the people decide who will be elected. This process needs to be changed and attempts were recently made in the last legislative session but were blocked in the Senate Education Committee.

The current vacancy came when Board Member Richard Moss moved to Arizona in mid-March. A couple of weeks later, Governor Huntsman decided that Michael Johnsen would be the best man for the job. I agree! But the Governor didn't get advice from the Legislators as he should have. The Legislators will need to approve the newly appointed board member, which will likely happen later this month, but Richard Moss has called for them to block the Governor's pick on grounds that it wasn't a fair and open process. He makes an excellent point!

20A-1-507. Midterm vacancies in the State Board of Education.

(1) If a vacancy occurs on the State Board of Education for any reason other than the expiration of a member's term, the governor, with the consent of the Senate, shall fill the vacancy by appointment of a qualified member to serve out the unexpired term.

(2) The lieutenant governor shall issue a certificate of appointment to the appointed member and certify the appointment to the board.

The biggest hypocrites in all of this is Senate leadership, specifically Senator Howard Stephenson. He was quoted by the Salt Lake Tribune as saying, "We've heard a lot about transparency in government and the need to choose representatives of the people in an open process," he said, "and this didn't appear to be open." Stephenson said that the Governor should consider withdrawing Johnsen's selection.

Senator Stephenson is the man who, as President of the Utah Taxpayers Association, bragged that they were able to "beat back a challenge to the committee which recruits and nominates candidates for the state school board". Since I just wrote about his conflicts of interest, I'll simply suggest that you read my recent post on the topic. It's really quite unbelievable that he, out of anyone, would have a valid opinion on the matter. Senator Waddoups chimed in, too, and we all know the problems he's been having; removing Senator Buttars from one committee position and assigning him to another.

I agree with the selection by Governor Huntsman. I hope that the Senate will confirm Michael Johnsen. If they don't give their consent and instead cry foul due to the lack of openness, then I expect them to do something about the flawed nomination process that doesn't allow the people to fairly elect those who represent them. I expect that anyway...I'm just sayin'.

Comments (4)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous · 829 weeks ago

I suspect the Governor is so disgusted with the way the state school board is elected that when he had an opportunity to appoint someone with real education experience (what a novel idea!), he forged ahead. Personally I have a hard time envisioning how he would create a transparent process without running into the same problems that he did with the state board election appointments. If he wasn't willing to go against that committee's recommendations and choose some real educators to run for the board, I don't think he would go against the recommendations of another committee that might be set up to advise and recommend names for this seat, and obviously he would be under a great deal of pressure to form a committee that pleased the legislators. He is darned because he did and darned because he didn't. I'm just greatful that this time he listened to Chris Kearl. The whole state board process is so political as to make it ridiculous.
I should add, I agree that the process needs to be more fair and open, but until we have legislators who understand those two words, I am just grateful to chaulk one up for the good guys.
1 reply · active 829 weeks ago
You hit the nail on the head! VERY good insight as to why the Governor did what he did. You obviously understand the history and I'm glad you pointed it out. My favorite part about what you said that rings so true...

"...fair and open...until we have legislators who understand those two words, I am grateful to chaulk one up for the good guys."

Well said!
Anonymous's avatar

Anonymous · 829 weeks ago

The only reason Richard Moss is upset is because he obviously had lined up someone for his seat who would vote the same way Richard voted which was to ignore his constituents and vote with PCE. The Governor just grabbed the ball and made an end run before Richard could force the Governor through a committee process or whatever to seat Richard's chosen replacement. I can say all this because this state school board member is the one who represents me, and I am grateful to almost have Michael Johnson even though I would have preferred someone from south Utah County.
1 reply · active 829 weeks ago
Another great comment! I'm sure that has a lot to do with why Richard Moss is upset, and I'm sure the Governor had in mind how ridiculous the "process" could become based on how ridiculous the "process" already is. Thank you for your comments!

Post a new comment

Comments by